I enjoy reading, nowadays mostly fiction and programming books. Here are some books and RSS feeds I’m reading or recommend.

Books

Articles

Here are the blogs and websites I subscribe to, along with their live feeds. I mostly read about tech. Some of them are in Chinese.

Download my OPML

  • The Verge

    Anthropic’s business plan: Build God or die trying

    The Anthropic S-1 seems to have provided the financial justification for the company to spend as much as it possibly can on compute. If you are the kind of person who wonders if Anthropic is doing its level best to build a machine god while convincing Wall Street it's in the business of selling IT contracts, Anthropic has just offered a handy solution: Doing a bunch of things that look like you're trying to build the machine god is the only way to avoid going bankrupt.

    Forget about the machine god for a minute. At least in my read of the S-1, it seems like Anthropic is pinning the future of its company to dramatic growth; it has to, in orde …

    Read the full story at The Verge.

    View original
  • kottke.org

    I made a small tweak to Prometheus (gift link discovery...

    I made a small tweak to Prometheus (gift link discovery site) that kinda kicks ass: NYT Cooking is now a separate source (which you can filter by). The Rigatoni With White Bolognese recipe is a favorite of mine. 🤌

    View original
  • China Books Review

    Fetishized

    Reviewed: Fetishized: A Reckoning with Yellow Fever, Feminism and Beauty by Kaila Yu (Crown, August 2025).

    Every time I publish a widely circulated story — such as a personal essay I wrote last summer about my multicultural wedding — I receive sexist and racist direct messages and comments from men trying to belittle me, calling me “white worshipping chink” and other slurs. The men are diverse in race, age and political beliefs, but they all have one thing in common: they see Asian women as objects. To them, we’re nothing more than racialized sex trophies, seen through the lens of fetishization and hypersexualization. When they see women speaking out and challenging this narrative, they feel the urge to put us back in our place — that place being as objects of male fantasy, domination and pleasure.

    Earlier in my journalistic career, I would save all the abusive messages I received. Celeste Ng, a writer also of Chinese heritage who has spoken out about being harassed online for marrying a white man, referred to them as “packets of poison.” I called mine “fan mail,” and collected them into a folder on my phone called “Hinge Cringe.” When I entered my 30s, the messages became so commonplace and repetitive that I barely click them open now before deleting.

    Buy the book

    It saddens me that Asian fetish and racialized sexual harassment have become such a normalized part of my life. Its most blatant manifestations (verbal and physical abuse) are always unpleasant, but the more subtle forms — such as compliments that reinforce racialized tropes, or cultural appropriation disguised as appreciation — can be even more exhausting, for they require more effort to untangle and explain. This is even more common in the era of K-pop and Chinamaxxing, against the backdrop of a global anti-gender movement, misogynistic memes like the Oxford study (a fake study cited by trolls seeking to demean Asian women dating white men), and the prevalence of sexually explicit deepfake content.

    There’s clearly an urgent need to examine the roots of this pervasive trend and how it distorts Asian women’s sense of value. Kaila Yu’s incisive and vulnerable memoir Fetishized: A Reckoning with Yellow Fever, Feminism and Beauty is an exceptional attempt at doing just that. Born in Taiwan and raised in California, Yu pursued a career in modeling, acting and music — she had a small role in The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006) and was the lead singer for the all-Asian American female rock band Nylon Pink — before becoming a freelance culture writer. At once highly intimate and thoroughly researched, the book follows Yu’s coming-of-age in the late 1990s and early 2000s, grappling with internalized racism and sexism as she becomes a pinup and import car model, as well as with the dehumanizing process of auditioning as a performing artist for Western media roles that reduced Asian women to hypersexual stereotypes. As Yu explains in her introductory chapter:

    The Asian fetish is more than mere preference and admiration of physical features like hair, skin, and eyes. It’s a myopic, generalized belief that Asian women inherently embody traits of submissiveness and obedience.

    Westerners have a long history of objectifying Asian people, women in particular, with aesthetics such as chinoiserie becoming popular during the 17th and 18th centuries, shortly after Western empires and trade interests expanded into the region. The first record of a Chinese woman stepping foot onto U.S. soil was Afong Moy, a 14-year-old from Guangzhou who was leased from her father by American traders and brought to be exhibited in New York in 1834. After touring U.S. cities as a Chinese decorative object on display for American consumers, she disappeared from public record and died in obscurity.

    Fetishized provides background on this early exoticization of Asian women but largely focuses on the more contemporary roots of Asian fetishization, through a mix of historical analysis and cultural criticism. Yu skillfully examines how movies and TV shows such as The Toll of the Sea (1922), The World of Suzie Wong (1960) and Memoirs of a Geisha (2005) perpetuated harmful narratives about Asian women as exotic, disposable and sexually submissive, while Ally McBeal (1997-2002) and Charlie’s Angels (2000) reinforced “dragon lady” stereotypes painting Asian women as “sexually voracious, conniving, powerful and reptilian” (the memoir ends with a non-exhaustive list of such fetishized portrayals in mainstream media).

    Yu also analyzes the evolution and cultural impact of aesthetic labels such as ABG (Asian Baby Girl or Asian Baby Gangster), a term coined in the late 1980s to describe the Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian female teenage refugees who became the first members of California’s Asian gangs. Later co-opted by East Asians as a means to rebel against the model minority myth, ABG became a highly sexualized aesthetic, one that Yu says continues to cater to male Orientalist fantasies.

    It saddens me that Asian fetish and racialized sexual harassment have become such a normalized part of my life.

    The book’s contextualization of Asian fetish within the broader history of Western colonization is particularly noteworthy. In an early chapter, Yu describes how, on the eve of Japan’s surrender in World War II, the wartime government set up brothels with prostitutes or “recruits” for the American troops they soon expected to be occupying the country, to prevent them from raping local women. “These women had to service fifteen to sixty solders a day and described the sex with American GIs as ghastly and animalistic,” writes Yu. American soldiers were also sent to Tokyo, Seoul, Hong Kong, Taipei, Kuala Lumpur, Singapore and Hawaii for “Rest & Recreation” (which some soldiers jokingly referred to as “rape and restitution”), according to scholar Kimberly Kay Hoang’s 2015 book Dealing in Desire. During the Vietnam War, the rape and sexual assault of Vietnamese women by American soldiers was both rampant and normalized, so much so that U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright said in a speech in 1966 that Saigon had “both literally and figuratively” become “an American brothel.”

    …

    Continue reading
  • The Verge

    AI has come for Arizona’s water

    A hulking gray giant rises from the desert. Inside, engineers create the force behind our phones and computers and appliances, our streaming services and search engines and chatbots and vibe-coded apps and websites. The complex is simultaneously massive and squat, dwarfed by the mountains that surround it, and it is endless. I drive past one building, and then another, and then the ground opens up where construction crews have dug up the earth so a third building can rise. There is a parking lot, and then another, and then another. There is an empty lot on the other side of the street, full of cars and the occasional food truck to feed the thousands of laborers who are busy transforming this expanse of desert into an industrial park. There is dust, so much of it, choking the air.

    I stand before the savior of Arizona’s economy. Like all great deities, it demands sacrifice. In the desert, nothing is more precious than water, and water is what must be given — nearly 5 million gallons a day, every day, sourced from Phoenix’s municipal supply. The offering has been well worth it.

    All of this is the fruit of the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world’s leading producer of microchips. Its Arizona operation is the result of a pre-pandemic gamble Phoenix made to revive its sluggish economy, which never quite rebounded from the Great Recession. Now TSMC’s foundry looms over the city’s outskirts.

    TSMC is a success story, one that some local leaders may have hoped to repeat with hyperscale data center developments. The progression may have seemed natural: The Grand Canyon State is not only home to the largest chip factory this side of the Pacific but also 172 data centers, neither of which faced much pushback. But the newer, larger developments being proposed from Phoenix to Tucson demand more of everything — more water, more power, more land — than Arizonans are willing to give. Where TSMC was welcomed with open arms and the first wave of data centers was largely ignored, new developments are facing mass backlash in Arizona, where a grassroots, surprisingly bipartisan coalition of residents has united against data centers.

    Now the state has a sixth C, Arizona native Christine Mackay tells me. “Chips.”

    In reporting this story, I spoke to local activists and economic developers, elected officials and their angry constituents. I sat in on city council meetings where people lined up by the dozens to speak up against data center projects, and in cozy suburban homes where tight-knit groups of former strangers told me about the struggle that brought them together. I pored over maps of Arizona’s dry, cracked landscape with laypeople who, over the past two years, have made themselves experts on zoning and land use and water consumption so they can understand the beast they’re trying to fight. The locals on both sides of this debate claim to want the same thing: a better, more prosperous Arizona. Their visions for achieving it, however, are completely at odds.

    In Arizona and elsewhere, data center developers have tried to win over locals by making enticing promises about the jobs, tax revenue, and infrastructure they’ll bring with them. All they ask for in exchange is water — and, they swear, not nearly as much of it as you’d expect. Some hyperscale data centers, like Google’s facility in The Dalles, Oregon, use about 1.5 million gallons a day, about one-third of what TSMC’s Arizona complex consumes in the same timeframe. Those reassurances, however, aren’t enough to assuage Arizonans, who now have to contend with the fact that the state will soon lose access to nearly 30 percent of the water it receives from the Colorado River.

    Even now, as people across the country sour on AI and fight against data centers in their communities, TSMC’s Arizona operation hums along without significant opposition. And yet it’s impossible to make sense of why Arizonans are so opposed to new data center development without first understanding why they eagerly welcomed TSMC, even though both industries must contend with the issue that has plagued Arizona since its founding: There isn’t enough water.

    For as long as anyone could remember, business in Arizona revolved around the storied “five C’s”: cattle, copper, cotton, citrus, and climate, a catchall for the region’s mild, salubrious winters, which locals say often more than make up for the sweltering summers.

    Now the state has a sixth C, Arizona native Christine Mackay tells me. “Chips.”

    The TSMC development is, in a sense, Mackay’s doing. As the head of Phoenix’s economic development office, she spearheaded the effort that brought the Taiwanese giant to the Sonoran Desert. In 2020, while the global economy was all but shut down, TSMC made an announcement. The same forces that brought the world to a standstill had created even more demand for TSMC’s products, and in response, TSMC would be opening an advanced semiconductor foundry — a “fab,” in industry jargon — in Phoenix. Initially, TSMC predicted that it would pour $12 billion into Arizona’s economy by 2029. Since then, TSMC’s projected expenditure in the state has ballooned to $265 billion, what the company touts as the largest foreign direct investment in US history.

    TSMC just put the finishing touches on its second fab in a formerly desolate swath of north Phoenix, with a third under construction and plans for several more underway. This buildout has been more than a decade in the making. TSMC started shopping around for a US location in 2016. That year, Mackay said, the company put out a request for proposals through a codename. No one won.

    “We aren’t a group that takes no for an answer,” Mackay said proudly. Her office asked TSMC executives what they thought Arizona was missing, and then spent the next three years addressing their concerns. In 2019, Phoenix sent a delegation to Taiwan to share a new development plan for a science and technology park, the nucleus of which would be a factory,

    …

    Continue reading
  • Pixel Envy

    A Further Status Update on the Toaster-Refrigerator Project

    Joanna Stern, reporting for ABC News in 2012:

    And it was on that last point that Cook had a lot to say. When asked if Apple was planning to merge its tablet and laptop products, much as Microsoft is proceeding with Windows 8, Cook responded with a quip: “You can converge a toaster and a refrigerator, but those aren’t going to be pleasing to the user.”

    Cook elaborated that converging the iPad with a laptop would result in tradeoffs, ones Apple isn’t willing to make. “We are not going to that party, but others might from a defensive point of view.”

    Apple, today:

    Apple today introduced the all-new MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR Display, featuring breakthrough tandem OLED technology that delivers game-changing front-of-screen performance. Available in 14- and 16-inch models, MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR Display offers a visual experience unlike any other, transforming pro workflows with up to 2000 nits peak HDR and SDR brightness, an industry-leading 10,000,000:1 contrast ratio for exceptional detail, a 120Hz variable refresh rate, and a wider colour gamut covering both P3 and Adobe RGB for brilliant colours. The new MacBook Pro also introduces intuitive Touch capabilities on the Mac for the first time, opening up a whole new dimension for pros to interact with their content, from manipulating 3D models to playing musical instruments onscreen. […]

    One might point out, as they watch the Apple Developer videos about these touch features, that Apple is not in fact delivering the toaster-refrigerator hybrid of doom. MacOS looks mostly the same; even though touch targets in parts of the U.I. are larger, most controls remain the same visual size. When needed, MacOS gives more room, like if you use a finger to show a menu instead of a pointing device. This is merely about bringing touch as an optional interaction element to the Mac. And just look at the quote above: Apple does not even mention touch features — sorry, “Touch capabilities”, with a capital T — until the third sentence. If anything, this is a MacBook Pro with a nicer display that happens to support touch.

    But Apple is still asking people to pay more for it than the standard model, though not by as much as it might first appear. While the M6 MacBook Pro starts at $2,000 USD, the touch ones have an M5 Pro chip. Thus, the equivalent non-touch models start at $2,500 USD, and the touch ones at $2,900 USD. For that $400, you get an ostensibly nicer screen that supports touch input and has a Dynamic Island instead of a notch, and a lighter and thinner chassis.1

    What you do not get, though, is a true hybrid of an iPad and a Mac. The display does not fold back to create a tablet, for example, and it does not support Apple Pencil input. Yet. Apple also has not managed to reinforce the human arm or fix the ergonomic issues it has repeatedly identified when it was not selling a Mac with a touch screen. This is evidenced by the section of the developer video suggesting that developers should place denser and finer-grained controls around the edges of the screen where users can support their hand with the metal frame.

    Maybe I am just showing my age.

    • If component prices were not what they are, I wonder if these MacBook Pros would have been introduced as a replacement for the existing M5 Pro and M5 Max models, perhaps with a smaller price increase. ↥︎

    ⌥ Permalink

    View original

© 2026 Yuhao. All Rights Reserved. Made with love.

Privacy